Medical Billing Blog: Section - Medical Billing

Archive of all Articles in the Medical Billing Section

This is the archive containing links to all articles written in the Medical Billing section of our blog.

Click any of the article links below to read the entire article or browse another section to the right to read articles on another subject.

Tips for Coding Emphysema Visits

When you’re compiling the medical billing for an established patient with active emphysema (492.8, Other emphysema) and they present and are complaining of shortness of breath (786.05); the physician provides inhalation treatment, trains the patient on using the nebulizer at home, and provides an expanded problem-focused examination and medical decision-making of low complexity, how would you report this? There will be multiple codes for this visit as the emphysema was the reason for the visit however the physician also provided services and consulted regarding the nebulizer so there will need to be additional codings on the medical billing to take all the services rendered into consideration. Be sure and capture

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments

Varicose Vein Repair Reporting Tips

Varicose vein treatments are becoming more and more frequent as more patients are urged to get them treated to stave off the possibility of blood clots and other issues that can crop up later if they are left unaddressed by the patient. However reporting the varicose vein treatment procedure on the medical billing may be a little confusion for some; once you know the basics for setting it up – it’s easy! A good example would be if a patient with varicose veins in her left lower leg presents to the ED and is stating she has severe pain in her leg. One of the veins is clearly bleeding so

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments

Using Modifier 25 in Medical Billing

When claims require modifier 25, there are some simple tips you can use to know the modifier’s details, such as which code to append it to, as well as when to use the modifier. It is important to identify the claim makeup in order to solve the problem of which code to use modifier 25 with. Modifier 25 is a significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day as the procedure or other service. Do you attach modifier 25 to the well visit or to the sick code? Modifier 25 can be applicable on either code. Therefore, the answer depends on the claim

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments

Team Procedures

All too often, the problem in the case of team procedures, where multiple physicians are involved, is that the first physician’s claim that gets submitted wins. This is especially true when another provider takes credit for radiology services. Let’s take a look at a few examples, to help you figure out how to code your claims to make sure you get a radiology claim to your payer quickly. Example 1: Do both a radiologist and a speech language pathologist need to be present to code a modified barium swallow procedure? They may both need to be present. Guidelines recommend that the service be provided in a team setting. Note the

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments

Multiple Angiographies

It can sometimes be perplexing when a physician performs angiography on both legs and one arm. Which CPT codes should you use when reporting these procedures? You should report 75710 (which is Angiography, extremity, unilateral, radiological supervision and interpretation) as well as 75716 (angiography, extremity, bilateral radiological supervision and interpretation). Append modifier 59 (which is distinct procedural service) to code 75710. This will show that the procedures were in fact performed on different areas (the arm using the unilateral code and the legs using the bilateral code). The reason for this is that the National Correct Coding Initiative edits bundle unilateral angiogram code 75710 into bilateral angiogram code 75716 with

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments

E/M and Repair on Laceration Claims

Let’s say an otherwise healthy man reports to the ED with lacerated index and middle fingers on the palmar surface, but there is no significant bleeding. The patient cut himself on a table saw. There is a 1.5cm jagged laceration with protruding fat located on the pad of the distal phalanx of both fingers. The physician uses Marcaine to apply digital blocks to both fingers, explores the wounds and finds no foreign bodies, and then closes the wounds. This encounter should be coded with a pair of E codes, in order to identify the cause of injury. Report this claim as follows: Report 12002 for the wound closure (this is

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments

Medial Dislocation – Billing it Right

A common occurrence in the emergency is the dislocation of various joints. They are sometimes incorrectly handled as breaks but shouldn’t be and you could be setting your practice up for a denial at best and audit at worst if you report these procedures incorrectly on your medical billing. Even if the reduction of the dislocation fails, the attempt should be reported on not only the medical billing as a procedure but also in the documentation as another procedure will have to be tried to relocate the elbow to its proper placement and you can show the timeline for the necessity of other and more involved treatments. On the claim

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments

When New Billing Codes Aren’t Recognized

In medical billing, code recognition is not the only reason for denial. If a claim containing a new code is denied, go through your medical billing claim and make sure it is absolutely accurate. Then you can probably narrow down the reason to simply a matter of the carrier not recognizing the CPT code. When new medical billing codes are introduced there is a lag period that lets coders and payers get adjusted for that specific code. HIPPAA sets an effective date for all medical billing codes that states when companies must begin using the codes or accepting the new codes. It is illegal to deny claims for no recognition

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments

The 4 Big Myths of OB-Gyn Medical Billing

OB-Gyn medical billing can be very confusing and some physcians will under code their medical billing claims as they fear an audit so they don’t submit full claims but in fact, this practice will cost you money. In order to understand OB-Gyn billing fully, you must understand the myths associated. There are four medical billing myths associated with OB-Gyn medical billing that may be holding back your reimbursements. The first myth deals with the initiation of the ob record. If both the ob-gyn and the nurse see the patient for initial blood work, you should not report a minimal code for both instances. In OB medical billing, you should report

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments

Making Inpatient Reporting Easy

One of the most difficult medical billing feats is inpatient consultation coding. There are many instances when a follow-up inpatient consult should be replaced by a subsequent hospital care visit. To eliminate these medical billing errors, there are four facts to consider when coding for inpatient consults. The first fact is very obvious. If your report an inpatient consultation exam, the patient must be inpatient, not outpatient. Very often physicians see patients on a consultation basis when they are outpatient. Medical billing mistakes can be made easily. Double check your work. It is important in medical billing to always report one initial consultation. This code will correspond with the very

Published By: Kathryn E, CCS-P - Retired | No Comments